Wednesday, January 28, 2009

നൊണയറിയാന്‍ നേരത്തെയറിയാന്‍

  1. It was said that the Lavalin deal was worth 376 crores . But now it is said that the total payment made to SNC Lavalin was only 185.1 crore. So the story about crores keep fluctuating….

The CAG classified the total loss considering the defective machines brought in, the loss due to lack of production for some period etc. Deshabhimani is talking as if there is no loss due to lack of production. The finance minister says it is all ‘mind arithmetics’. When he says each harthal is a loss of these many rupees, what is he saying?

CBI is now talking about the loss from our pockets, without considering the loss of money which would have reached our pocket had things been undisturbed.

And by whose standards is 185 crores negligible?

  1. Justice KrishnaIyer says CBI is trying to target people

Gone with the next wind. KrishnaIyer tried to be quoted out of context and got what it deserved.

But this newspaper didn’t even give his clarification after having misquoted him as the head news the previous day. None other than the resident editor trapping Krishna Iyer.

This is their opinion regarding CBI also. If they feel its favorable, then all praise else backstab. If CBI is so bad why did the cabinet complain of the center government not imposing CBI investigation in Marad case, just the previous week? What was the demand for the Muthanga struggle?

  1. UDF agreement in 1995 is the ‘Original Agreement’.

Yes. UDF agreement was original and was a 24 crore agreement for consultancy. LDF agreement was ‘Duplicate’ and is a 285 crore agreement for supply of goods. LDF agreement is termed duplicate as the contract for supply of machines were given to a consultant middleman and not the manufacturer.

  1. G Karthikeyen should have been the first accused- Thomas Issac

No debate . Let him also be booked. But will all murderers be let off till Sukumarakurup is booked?

But here the finance minister is saying that the deal is corrupt. Just that he feels there should be some more accused. No debate on this and the CBI might do so when the investigation is over.

  1. Global Tenders were not possible as the ‘original agreement’ was signed by UDF”

Preparation of tender papers were part of the Consultancy agreement signed by UDF.Will Deshabhimani say that it was mandatory that goods should have been procured from SNC Lavalin? No ,even they can’t say so as SNC Lavalin does not manufacture anything. That means it has to be procured from some firm which is a manufacturer. They actually procured it from Alstom, Canada. Why didn’t we procure it from Alstom? The question is instead of we doing the procurement why was it handed over to SNC Lavalin thereby spending much more as commission.

Even if we agree to avail loan from EDC, we could have called for tenders from Canada. Then we could have procured these goods from Alstom or any other firm there at a much cheaper cost. But instead we decided to accept loan with conditions against the proclaimed policy, used middlemen and ended up paying huge commission .

Having done that, why did we again make the payment for consultancy and supervision? Whom did we expect SNC to supervise? Themselves?

  1. The news of Pinarayi Vijayan being one of the accused appeared in many newspapers much earlier. This is enough evidence for connivance between the investigating agency and these newspapers.”

Deshabhimani says they will tell the truth, early. In the Brahmapuram case, it reported weeks earlier that Padmarajan is going to be booked. Did it connive then? There are many such examples. They are talking as if there is no investigative journalism.

A week before Pinarayi was formally named an accused, Deshabhimani published an article which appeared in People’s Democracy 6 months back, in the front page. This article was saying CBI is baised. Why was that article reproduced, then? Why did it find its way to the front page rather than the usual edit page? Does this mean that Deshabhimani also tried to connive with CBI but failed?

  1. Had LDF decided not to proceed with supply agreement, we should have given huge compensation. Hence Balanandan report could not have been honored.”

This is an utter lie. This is as good as saying if we get an architect to sketch for a house, we should construct it. No consultancy report can force a democratically elected government. We should realize that such governments are higher than not just NHPC but SNC Lavilin’s report also.

Also, It is like saying we continued the same mistake that UDF did because otherwise the UDF would have been exposed.

And about the compensation(if at all) being ‘huge’, after all the project itself was worth only 24 crores and we ended up loosing much more.

  1. If we had decided not to proceed with supply agreement as per Lavalin’s consultancy report we could not have carried out the renovation work in the near future”

This is again not true. And this contradicts their above argument. Balanandan committee was suggesting that such total Renovation was not required in the near future. So here they are saying they could have stuck to Balanandan report.

  1. Not just that, if signing the agreement with SNC was delayed, then the target of increasing power generation would also have been defeated.”

Not even one unit was additionally generated. CAG has remarked that the renovation failed in even achieving the pre-renovation generation capacity .

The target also was not enhanced production but just replacement and installation of new units to ensure same production levels. The reason cited for the complete renovation was that the fair life period of these machines were only 35 years. Hope they will not tell Sreemathy teacher that in human beings ageing starts at the age of 25.

In fact suggestion by Balanandan committee would have enhanced production but that suggestion was ignored.

  1. NHPC has opined that the rates are comparable with international rates”

Another lie. NHPC has said the rates are comparable with international rates “keeping in view the soft loan with Grant element”

  1. NHPC was entrusted with the responsibility of crosschecking the rates shown in consultancy agreement before proceeding with that agreement further.”

Again a lie. NHPC was consulted only 8 months after the Supply agreement was signed by LDF government.

  1. The democratically elected Cabinet is higher than NHPC”

Then why NHPC at all….. If that is the case, since MD is bigger no auditors are needed in any firm.

  1. It is said the agreement was broken into three to bypass CEA. But that was because these are three different projects. Else they should have said all projects in Periyar are one.”

How was it negotiated? How was it written in files? Why were no other projects in Periyar clubbed with this?

  1. Criticising something after it has obtained cabinet approval is anti-democratic. CBI just need to enquire if there was cabinet approval. It need not go beyond that and check whether a minister has mislead the entire cabinet.”

The statement makes everything very clear…. Apply for a ‘mappusakshi’ …

  1. The grant of 45 crores was made 98 crores. But this is not appreciated.”

They could have made it 980 crores …. What use if nothing is paid?

  1. Thomas Issac in Mathrubhumi (29/01)“Original agreement, Consultancy agreement, MOU, Supply agreement, Final Agreement ... It is confusion allround . This is what anti-party forces are aiming for”

Who used all these terms? Just search the newspapers of the previous one week. And If it is Thomas Issac and co, you know what was the intention now.

  1. Issac Mathrubhumi (29/01) “ The issue is regarding the oldest projects Pallivasal(1940), Senkulam (1954) nad Panniar (1963) renovation. The common understanding is that after 25-30 years, renovation and replacement should be done. Balanandan report was received only a few days before traveling to Canada for signing the final agreement “

This means Pallivasal was 57 years old, Sengulam 43 and Panniar 34 years old. This itself revokes the ‘common understanding’ that after 25- 30 years the stuff should be replaced. If he still keeps that ‘common understanding” then he should have alook at the generation capacity after renovation.

About receiving the report only days before signing the final agreement, that is another way of saying the final report was signed just 8 days after Balandandan committee submitted its report. That is Issac for you. Would have been nice if he could also tell us the reason for the hurry, especially after appointing a committee and asking them to give a report in 2 months. Especially since the project was just because of the ‘common understanding’ that 25-30 years it should be replaced and not for increased power generation. Why was this ‘common understanding’ lacking in 1987? And would have been great if he had also said that the cabinet approved this only after one year.

  1. Issac: I trapped Karthikeyan and he finally agreed After having availed loan from Canada, we cannot go for global tender.

No consultancy can force us to avail a loan. The loan from EDC was availed by Pinarayi.

The consultancy report suggested this loan but we decided in 1996 when the ministerial delegation visited Canada and availed it only in 1996 . This portion is hidden purposefully. Then what Issac said is true. After having availed EDC loan you cannot go for a global tender but you can go for a tender in Canada.

The machines were procured from Alstom Canada by SNC Lavalin. Instead why couldn’t we procure it from Alstom directly? Or some other Canadian firm? Which clause in EDC loan conditions prevent this? Can Issac make this clear?

  1. Neriamangalam, we had signed the MOU. But no consultancy agreement. We cancelled the MOU and went for global tender. But the court ruled in ABB’s favour”

Very True. But the court clearly said it is because the project plan was not changed at all. Here we were rethinking about the whole project plan which is clearly our prerogative.

If we had stuck to Balanandan report, no one could have stopped us or gone to court.

The consultancy agreement was only worth 25 crores. So the argument that supply was part of it is absurd.

  1. Pinarayi reduced the rates as shown in the table and increased the grant….”

Me : “How much did they offer?”

Issac/Pinaray : “45 crores”

Me : “You bargained and they increased it .Right?”

Issac/Pinaray : “Yes , I made it 98 crores”

Me : “Good, What did you do with that?”

Issac/Pinaray :“We paid Technicaliya 8 crores for building, they we got cheated by SNC and Karthikeyan/UDF”

Nice Bargain!!. And the finance minister out defending it. God save your own country.

(After all, he knows which areas not to thread. Saying nothing about Malabar Cancer Center and Technicaliya )

  1. What about the comparison given by Thomas Issac? The rates which UDF agreed was reduced.

Thomas Issac who has made many tables in his essays knows best that he should compare between two equals. UDF agreement required us to pay only 24 crores to SNC Lavalin. Then what 182 crores is he talking about? So he is comparing between a brochure price and the price we actually paid.

  1. Karthikeyan should have been among the accused

Agreed. Are you saying Pinarayi is as good as Karthikeyen?

23) After Renovation we got power worth 1100 crores – Deshabhimani (29/01)

Wait for another 5 years it will become 2200 crores . But the author has published another tableand is not as shrewd as our finance minister. The power generation before during the project and after the project is also shown. Just take a look at the power generation from 1994 to 1998 , from 1998 to 2002 and from 2002 to 2008. The table .

clearly tells you what happened. Poor guy, I only hope he does not loose his job.

24) The total amount spend for the project is only 333.8 crores. Then how can CAG say we lost 376 crores? –Deshabhimani PMManoj (29/01)

Just ask your colleague Mohandas. In his report mentioned in the above question, he has given the table which clearly tells you the generation from 98 to 2002 decreased. This loss is added to the 338 crore by CAG. If you don’t understand just ask Mohandas how he got 1100 crores. Before quoting him and asking TVR shenoy whether he will be shocked you should have known this.

25) Karthikeyen went to Canada . As a follow up Nayanar and Pinarayi went to Canada and continued it.

Poor Nayanar. Please spare him. Why is Deshabhimani hiding the fact that Pinarayi visited Canada along with the first accused and that Nayanar went there only after the deal was finalized.

26) Neriamangalam project shows, getting out of the consultancy agreement was not possible.

About Neriamangalam, the reply is given above in question 19. But just have alook at questions 7 and 8 in this list. The same author has said that if we had gone by Balanandan report then we could not have carried out the same project in the near future. Can he explain these two statements? Here he says we could not get out at all. But there he says if we had got out of it then the total renovation could not have been done soon after. This statement is because of the Neriamangalam verdict. In fact that verdict is an argument for those who say we should not have gone ahead with the project. Now they are making a dog out of a goat.

27) “We should have gone to Paris to fight it out in the court “

That is if we had cancelled the consultancy agreement and if we had refused tomake the payment of 26 crores. Then we should have gone to Paris and fought it as per Indian laws. But not if we have made another commitment of 185 crores.

28) “ The laws of Ontario province was made applicable in the agreement between KSEB and EDC for the loan” – PM Manoj Deshabimani (29/01/09) ‘Maram Peyyumbol’

You have let the cat out.

That Global Tenders were not possible is a loan condition of EDC. Who signed this loan agreement? If the LDF government did, who put us ina situation where Global tenders are not possible? Even you will not say it was a condition imposed by SNC Lavalin and not EDC. Because not just NHPC , a foreign consultant like SNC Lavalin also is not above our Cabinet.

Can CPI(M) avail loans with such conditions?

Did Sivadasamenon’s Finance ministry say that this particular clause is “something which no sovereign state can agree”. Did the law ministry also support it?

Did Pinarayi write that Varadachary is a madcap in the file?

Now that you have agreed that EDC loan and thereby money for the project was gained by LDF, will you stop confusing people about Original, duplicate….

29) Balanandan committee was not expected to consider this project. The Nayanar ministry approved this project because it had no other option but to go with it as the consultancy agreement was signed and because the power generation should be improved.

That Balanandan committee didn’t rise or fall as per your expectation is understandable.

And it is also true that Nayanar ministry had no other option but to approve this. But not because the consultancy agreement was signed. The cabinet considered this only on March 3, 1998 where as the agreement for supply was signed in February 10, 1997 itself.

Hence the ministry had no other option. Let Deshabhimani contest these dates. About power generation, the table of power generation published today tells the story. And Thomas Issac’s article clearly says it was because of the ‘common knowledge’ that these machines should be replaced every 25 years that we went with the project.

30) “The price list is given in the UDF agreement in 1995 itself. NHPC was consulted to see if the price is justifiable. They said it is comparable to international standards. Other than taking this in face value what else can a government do?” PM Manoj Deshabhimani (29/01/09) ‘ Maram Peyyumbol’

Now you ask “ other than taking NHPC on face value what else can a government do” but 2 days back you and Mr Prabha Varma said “ NHPC is not above the elected government”. (Please don’t loose your stability)

When NHPC was consulted, did you send them the ‘reduced price’ as against the price listed in UDF agreement?

When was NHPC approached? They were approached in October 1997, 8 months after the agreement for supply was signed. They submitted the report only on Nov 1997.

Was NHPC given the technical specification asked for? NO. they said in the final report that even after repeatedly asking for it the technical specifications were not given without which they could not evaluate the price.

Did NHPC say the prices are comparable? Yes But only because of the Grant element.

Was the cabinet apprised of this and presented the report of NHPC? No, relevant portions were purposefully hidden says CBI.

31) That KSEB is referred to as a company is just a typing mistake

The KSEB officials who found their way to the accused list and others missed it out is a joke. It was very clearly said “company registered under companies act of 1956” and was not just a mere word.

Could you also explain us what was the KEISP (Kerala Energy Infrastructure Services Project) which is clearly referred in the minutes of the ministerial delegation which visited Canada ? Did it say of dividing KSEB into different cost centers and forming a company?

32) “When we buy a bulb for home, we can buy Chinese stuff woth Rs 500 or a Japenese one ... Casting opinion without knowing its technical side ... you can just stretch Yourselves”

This is a revelation. You should think about this before saying the 26 member expert committee whose suggestions helped Kerala overcome the acute power crisis didn’t have the expertise to look into this particular project.

21 comments:

  1. Dear Sagave
    Sri - pinarayi vijayan

    Don t very this problem ,this problem solve and soon
    You rattan again party sectary –please Remo cancer in side party urgent

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why cannot CPI(M) co-operate with investigation? If Pinnarayi is clean, why does he fear Court? One PB member says CPI(M) will not yield to external pressure... CPI(M) need not. But it should not breach Constitution of India. Courts are constitional entities. Why CPI(M) is agianst Indian Constitution???

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Keralaites
    It's mere shame that the well organised influential communities in Kerala are behaving/protesting against the law enforcement agencies and preventing our judicial laws/system to execute it's responsibilities and work.
    For instance lets take the two recent incidents in Kerala
    1.Catholic Christians especially the Knanaya Catholics in Kerala were protesting left and right agains CBI in the arrests of two Criminal Priests and a Criminal Nune.CPM was very happy to watch this drama in Kerala and they were all in high Praise of CBI for the steps they have taken in Sr.Abhaya's case.The catholic daily Deepika was all against the arrests of these Criminal Missionaries.The catholic High Priests and their "mooduthangi" retired high Profile Personalities in Kerala did all kinds of nonesense to influence the judiciary and get away with what they wanted.The Criminals were out of CBI's reach in a months time due to the high influence of fraud missionaries in Kerala.No common man believed these missionaries are innocent in Sr.Abhaya's case but the loop holes in our judicial system helped these criminals to be out once again in the posh life style.Remember ,CPI(M) celeberated the whole episode of Sr.Abhayas case when CBI arrested those criminals.

    2.In the second case CBI put CPM in defense where the Party Secretary himself is numbered 9th
    in the charge sheet.Like the catholic High Priests few uncultured ministers and most of the corrupte leaders took the issue into the streets of Kerala.They shouted that they'll cut the hands of people who go against the party Secretarty and they threated the CBI too.From all nook and corner of CPM most leadres supported the party secretary except few ideal leaders like VS.It's surprising and amazing to see the one man army fight of VS against the corrupt leaders and corrupt politics.Long live VS....Now the catholic daily in Kerala is all praise of CBI unlike they were in Sr.Abahya's case.They support CBI and going against Pinarai becs once he tried his level best to tarnish the image of certain Bishops in Kerala and it's shameful to see a catholic newspaper is trying to take revenge against some one instead of forgiving as Jesus said.They are opportunists!!! like any other political Party in Kerala...

    Now lets think...We the common Public are still fools and donkeys??Can't we do anything to save Kerala and save people like VS?

    ReplyDelete
  4. ITHRAYUM POINTS OKKE KOLLAAM... PAKSHE cbi CASE EDUTHU NNU PARANJUKELKKUNNATHU EE KAARYANGALKKONNUM ALLALLO?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Janashakthi's editor and PK Prakash and all other imperial pimps are behind this scandal. Congress trying to win the election in kerala by framing CPM in CBI case. Communist will not die out by such a filthy case. Mr.V.S. is enemey in the ship itself , We all know that when he bacme the chief not becuase of his merits alone but becuase of the party.
    Any way whoever made this blog they supposed to check the proof they got . like prof. Sugatan of Janashakthi blushed yesterday when he admitted that the Balandand letter published was a fake one.
    Better use your time for constructive thoughts not for destructive ideas.


    Rahim
    OMAN

    ReplyDelete
  6. A single person can do nothing in Kerala. CPM is not against the rule of law. It feels that it's Secretary has been 'trapped' by CBI. As we all are aware of the history of CBI, we cannot rule out such a possibility. Anyway, CPM decided to face this case legally and politically. Now it is before the Court. Let us wait and see what happens. Some of our 'friends' want VS to come out of the CPI-M. So, these guys are giving more importance to Com.VS than the Party. It is well known that CPI-M has no policy to project any of it's leaders above the Party. So, Pinarayi or VS, doesn't matter. Party organization should survive intact. Pinarayi & VS are just Party leaders, not 'Party owners'.
    It is my request to those who wish a better future for Kerala: Please do not try to disintegrate or divide the No.1 secular political party (CPI-M) which contributed much to the development of Kerala. Don't forget the fact that communal forces are keenly looking for their chance to replace secular forces. Never forget --- COMMUNISM is far better than COMMUNALISM.
    Warm regards to all.

    Sincerely,
    saleemcholan@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. As far as CPI-M is concerned, either Pinarayi or V.S. are not so important. They are just leaders of the party; not 'OWNERS' of the party. Those who love the party should support the party organisation and not it's leaders.

    Warm Regards,
    Saleem Cholamukath
    saleemcholan@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. All Young commrades should re-think in supporting a person with corruption cases against him. Act like a communist.... act against injustice & corruption...... act against Pinarayi to SAVE OUR PARTY.... Think yourself for the Party not for a person like Pinarayi. Be a Pure COMMUNIST like VS. support VS,,,,,,,

    ReplyDelete
  9. when i read the full version of this blog,including the counter arguments by CPM leaders through Desabhimani and vocals, it seems that the objections against allegationis nothing but excuses.when we coordinate these "excuses" it is far away from the real Lavalin-KSEB deal.any body defend aginst allegations should have logical and coordinated and sequencial replies.but here,by CPM leaders, each persons arguing in their own way and these arguments have nothing logic in it.poor and shamefull "thinkers"

    ReplyDelete
  10. when we read the statements from CPM leaders and its mouthpieces who defends Mr.Pinarayi Vijayan, we can see that the arguments are not coordinated or sequential.each leader andeach organs have their own version regarding the lavalin deal.their only aim is to protect Vijayan.This will be a great mistake for vijayan later as he has to lay before the court a different and manipulated version during court procedings.Against him only one paper and that is CBI investigation report supported by CAG report.But now the desabhimani report,CPM leaders statements itself will make him trouble during argument in CBI court.
    Mr.Vijayan,you cannot escape from all this gimmics.The way by which you tried to defend yourself was wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  11. കേരളത്തിലെ ഭൂരിപക്ഷം ജനങ്ങളും വിശ്വസിക്കുന്നത് പിണറായി വിജയന്‍ കുറ്റക്കാരന്‍ അല്ലെന്നു ആണ്.കാരണം കഴിഞ്ഞ കുറെ വര്‍ഷങ്ങളായി ഈ കേസിനെ കേരളത്തിലെ ജനങ്ങള്‍ പഠിച്ചു വരികയാണ്. എന്ന് ഇലക്ഷന്‍ പ്രഖ്യാപിച്ചോ?അന്നൊക്കെ യു ഡി എഫ് ഈ കേസ് കുത്തിപ്പൊക്കി കൊണ്ടുവരും.ഇപ്പോള്‍ കൂട്ടിനു ചില കുലം കുത്തികളും.ഇത് തികച്ചും രാഷ്ട്രിയ പ്രേരിതമായ ഒരു കേസെന്നതില്‍ കവിഞ്ഞ് മറ്റൊരു പ്രാധാന്യവും അര്‍ഹിക്കുന്നില്ല.ഒരു അന്വേഷണത്തെയും സി പി എം ഭയക്കുന്നില്ല.നിയമപരമായി അതിനെ നേരിടുകതന്നെ ചെയ്യും.പക്ഷെ അതോടൊപ്പം തന്നെ ബൂര്‍ഷ്വാ മാധ്യമങ്ങള്‍ പടച്ചു വിടുന്ന നുണ കഥകള്‍ കുറെ എങ്കിലും ജനങ്ങള്‍ തെറ്റി ധരിക്കാന്‍ ഇടയായിട്ടുണ്ട്.അവരെ സത്യാവസ്ഥ ബോധ്യപെടുതെണ്ടത് പാര്‍ടിയുടെ കടമയാണ്.അതിനെ നിയമ വ്യവസ്ഥയോടുള്ള വെല്ലുവിളിയായും ഭയമായും ചിത്രീകരിക്കുന്നത് കുറ്റം ആരൊപിക്കുന്നവരുടെ ആത്മവിശ്വാസ കുറവ് കൊണ്ടാണ്.കോടതി വിധി വരുന്നവരെ നമുക്കു കാത്തിരിക്കാം.

    ReplyDelete
  12. if CPM belives pinarai is clean, why should go to court and prove it? otherwise people of kerala will think pinerai is absolutly not clean sure.
    i belives achuthanadan is the only and one leader in the cpm very very clean.others like issac,elamaram ,palooli,sidhakaran,jayarajasmar,vijayakumar...etc are idots.

    ReplyDelete
  13. CPI(M)'s stand is very clear to take this issue politically and legally.Politically means to the people. As a reponsible Organization supported by the Majority of Keralites, It is the responsibility of the Party to prove its leader's cleaness to the people. For sure we can and will do it in the court also but it will take long time. The motive of the issue at this moment is purely focusing the upcomming Loksabha Elections and the Cong(I) led UDF have nothing to put in front of the people. I do beleive the brains behind this blog are some "some elements who were expelled from the party". There is a propoganda behind this which is politically Bias and targeting Com. Vijayan. Even they have fabricated a letter in the name of Com Balanandan. Just refer to the news headlines of July 23 2005, regarding a press conference where Balanandan has alleged the UDF for this Issue and stated that we were forced to follow further. The letter is allegedly wrote by him on 5th august 05 to the PB. Do we have to beleive Com. Balanandan change his stand in 13 days on an issue which was live 13 Years!

    CPI(M) is very confident and that is the only reason the party is facing the elections under the strong Leader Ship of Com. Vijayan.

    Thanks to CBI and the master brains of this conspirency , that give idle people like me to wake up and rally behind the party
    In fact the give us new enthusiasm
    Lal Salam

    ReplyDelete
  14. EP JAYARAJAN :

    CBI CMP(M) nu Pullaaanee ...

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Those who love the party should support the party organisation" -- for such criminal activities also ??

    ReplyDelete
  16. The way by which CPM state committee handled SNC-LAVALIN issue will be a political black spot in the history of corruption in politics.How they can take strong stand against corruption in public life in future?why they attacked P.K. kunhalikkuty and K.M. muneer, the ex ministers without any proof?Do they think that police,CBI,court,media must obey and act according to them?

    ReplyDelete
  17. The way Pinarayi Vijayan handled his party to organise against CBI and "anti-CPM" forces is brilliant.If we analyse why he so much cautious to bring all behind him some 6-7 years back, we get an idea how much he scared the ghost of Lavalin which may affect his political carrier in future.He knows only V.S. can make him trouble in future.also listen, during his campaign, he never attacked congress or its l;eaders particularly as he dont want personnel enemity with any national leaders.90% of his accusation is against R.S.S and BJP which is insignificant in the state.He will never attack against any UDF leaders.how brilliantly articulate his personnel aim in party.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If Mr. Pinnarayi Vijayan is clean why dont he go to court and prove that he is innocent. Instead the ministers who are supposed to protect people are threatning them that their hands and legs will be chopped. You cant expect more than this from CPM who said India didnt get freedom in 1947 and who suppourted China during its war with India. These sort of poeople must be arrested and send to jail. The uderlining fact is that people of Kerala/India are cheated by all politicians of this country and people are not recogonizing it. For which I feel sad.

    ReplyDelete
  19. പ്രിയ സഖാക്കളെ കെ പി സി സി പ്രസിഡന്റ് ശ്രീ രമേശ് ചെന്നിത്തലയ്ക്കെ തിരായിട്ടാണ് സി ബി ഐ യുടെ ഒരു കണ്ടെത്തല്‍ ഇതേപോലെ വന്നിരുന്നെങ്കില്‍ പ്രിയ സഖാക്കളെ നിങ്ങള്‍ കേരളം കുട്ടിച്ചോറാക്കുമായിരുന്നില്ലേ?
    പിണാറായി തെറ്റുകാരനല്ലെങ്കില്‍‍ നിങ്ങലെന്തിനു ഭയക്കുന്നു?
    ഈ രാജ്യത്തെ കോടതിയും കുറ്റന്വേഷണ ഏജന്‍സികളും പക്ഷാപാതപരമായിട്ട്ടാണ് പെരുമാറിയിരിക്കുന്നതെങ്കില്‍ അതിനെ തെളുവുകളുടെ അടിസ്ഥാനത്തില്‍ രാജ്യത്തെ നിയമവ്യവസ്ഥക്കകത്തുനിന്നുകൊണ്ടുവേണം ചോദ്യം ചെയ്യേണ്ടത്.
    അല്ലാതെ രാജ്യത്തെ നീതി നര്‍വ്വഹണ സംവിധാനങ്ങളെ സംഘടിതമായ ഗുണ്ടാശക്തി ഉപയോഗിച്ചു നേരിടാനാണ് ഉത്താവാദിത്വമുള്ള ഒരു രാഷ്ട്രിയ പ്രസ്ഥാനം എന്നു കരുതുന്ന കമ്യൂണിസ്റ്റ് മാര്‍ക്സിസ്റ്റ് പാര്‍ട്ടി ചെയ്യുന്നതെങ്കില്‍ ഈ രാജ്യത്തിന്റെ ഗതിയന്താണ്
    രാജ്യത്തെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ പല അഴിമതികള്‍ക്കും കൂട്ടു നിന്നിട്ടുള്ളതു നിങ്ങളല്ലേ?
    കഴിഞ്ഞ ഭരണകാലത്തെ പ്ലസ് ടു അഴിമതി
    ലോട്ടറികാരന്റെ പക്കല്‍ നിന്നും കോടികള്‍ വാങ്ങിയ അഴിമതി
    ഫരിസ് അബൂബേക്കറില്‍ നിന്നും കോടികള്‍ വങ്ങിയ അഴിമതി
    യൂണിവേഴ്സിറ്റിയിലെ സെക്കന്റ് ഗ്രേഡ് അസിസ്റ്റന്റ് നിയമനത്തിലെ അഴിമതി
    കള്ളുഷാപ്പ് സൊസൈറ്റികള്‍ക്കു ലേലത്തിനു കൊടുത്തു നടത്തിയ അഴിമതി
    ദേവസ്വംബോര്‍ഡിലെ ജിവനക്കരെ നിയമിച്ചതിലെ അഴിമതി
    സര്‍ക്കാര്‍ഭൂമി കൈയ്യറി പാര്‍ട്ടി ആഫിസ് നിര്‍മ്മിച്ചത്
    യൂണിവേഴ്സിറ്റിയുടെ ഭൂമി കൈയ്യേറി ഏകെ ജി സെന്റര്‍ നിര്‍മ്മിച്ചത്
    ഇങ്ങനെ അഴിമതികളുടെ പട്ടിക അവസാനിക്കുന്നില്ല
    ഈ നാട്ടിലെ ഒരു സാധാര പൗരന്റെ മനോവികാരങ്ങളാണ് ഇത്

    ReplyDelete
  20. A group of rivisionists and opportunists have taken over the control of CPM, just to live a royal life and amass money and comforts for their family. They want to build palatial homes for themselves and send their children to foreign colleges to study. All in the expense of the working class of this state. The politically commited comrades of CPM must work for these renegades, without questioning their filthy political tricks.
    Pinarayi must know that his tricky politics is coming to an end. His shameless watgh dogs, the triple Jayarajans, Elamaram Kareem, Thomas Isacc, A.K Balan, P.Sasi and the third rate idiot G.Sudhakaran all must know that their leader Pinarayi is no match for the most respected communist Com. V.S.
    Pinarayi & co. are going to the waste basket of history.
    Justice will reign supreme.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If Pinnarayi Vijayan is innocent why dont he go to court and prove his innocence. But if he notices his party fought against computerisation and now we can watch him carrying a laptop and a gun. He has built a big house recently and send his son abroad for studies and his daughter to coimbatore paying donation. And he and his party fights against private colleges here. After all these years of hard work I cant still afford to send my son to a private college by paying donation. From where did he earn money. Better we all becomes politicians so that we can also earn money like this. A government employee will be send to jail for 10 years for taking 300 Rs bribe while a politician is never send to jail for taking 300 crore. Can any body tell how many politicians had been jailed for corruption ?. They(All parties) all join hands when it comes to corruption and increasing their salary and allowance. You can see an MLA earning good salary and allowance and plus pension life long for working(:)) for 5 years. Great democracy!!! As politicians them selves says people are fools who never learn.

    ReplyDelete